VAR Debate

VAR debate: Is it ruining the game we love?


Every week VAR seems to be the talking point in the Premier League, as it appears to be causing more controversy then doing what it was put it place to do. In an ideal world, it would make any major decisions for the referee’s quick and clear, however it seems to have an opposite affect with it causing even more confusion between officials and what they actually need to do, for example do linesman raise their flags when it’s offside or do they let play continue? This is one of many points I will be covering in this blog and debating whether it is worth having.


Changing the roles of the officials

Since it’s been introduced, linesman have been told to let play continue unless it’s an obvious offside decision, then if a goal is scored with a player slightly offside VAR would overrule it. This sounds like a suitable system, however it causes way too much confusion as the margin between it being a clear offside and it being slightly offside is causing officials to do nothing when they probably would usually flag. Then for example, if a team was to get a corner from a player who was offside taking a shot, but the linesman doesn’t flag it as he has been told not to. If that team then goes onto score from the corner what happens then? They would have gained an unfair advantage because officials have been told to not do their jobs. This is one of the reasons why the VAR system needs to be tweaked as the referee’s and linesman’s should be briefed more clearly on what actions they take in a situation like this.


Should referees use the screens on the side of the pitch?

One of the most frustrating parts of the system is the fact that the referee’s do not use the monitors at the side of the pitch to look at the incident themselves before making a decision. Of course they have a team of people who are advising them, however for one of the Arsenal games this season one of the people who was working the VAR was someone who had never reffed a Premier League game himself, how has he possibly got more experience to make a big decision than the referee who could watch it himself on the monitor? It really does baffle me how the Premier League has a system in place like this. Not only would this save time and stop the delays during the game which never get added back on, in my opinion it would also mean officials get decisions right more often.


Is it killing emotion in football?

A lot of people will say this is the main reason why they don’t want VAR in football as it kills all the passion and celebrations when your team score a goal as even the slightest altercation in the build up could see it be taken away. This causes players to not celebrate scoring until the check has been completed and because it takes so long, by the time it’s done the moment has passed. One of the best parts of a football match is going mental with all your fellow fans when your team score and this completely takes this precious moments away from football fans.


Should a review system be put in place?

The idea of a review system may be an effective solution for the Premier League and might sort out most of the controversy, as for example each team would have two reviews a game where it can be checked by VAR. This could be used when a team feel an encroachment has occurred during the build up to a goal or when they believe a yellow card is worthy of a red card. This systems works well in other sports such as Cricket and Tennis and I see no reason why it wouldn’t work in Football. It might stop some of the debates as some extremely tight offside calls wouldn’t be checked and certain goals would stand when they haven’t been this season, also it would mean if a team didn’t review something it would be their own fault and not VAR’s.


Delays during the game

Almost every check that goes to VAR seems to take an age to review, leaving fans in the stadium and at home thinking what the officials are actually looking at? Very often it’s a straight forward decision that only needs to be looked at one to two times, but the people running it seem to take forever to inform the referee. I believe this could be sped up by the referee just looking at the screen himself after the people running it tell him to look at an accident he missed.


Getting decisions right

For all the negative parts to VAR there are some positives as it is technically getting tight offside decisions right even if it is by 0.1mm. There has been a lot of debate about whether it’s going too far into offside decisions, however I see it very clearly that when your offside no matter by the margin then it’s an encroachment. Of course football is about scoring goals, but these need to be scored fairly otherwise it takes the credibility away from the game. I believe that some fans didn’t actually fully think about what introducing VAR into the league would mean, the whole system is designed to help referees and guide them to the correct decision and these tight offside calls fall perfectly into this category. I know that the delays are ridiculous, but this is what it was brought into do, making every game as fair as possible to both teams. In the future, with a few changes, VAR will be one of the best parts of the game as eventually we will find a solution to the faults and become more efficient with it.


Obvious injustices are being removed from the game

Major events in the past such as Thierry Henry’s handball for France against vs Ireland and Diego Maradona’s “hand of god” would have been ruled out in todays game due to VAR which is a positive and I can remember a few decisions this season that would have been disastrous without the system in place, for example Aubameyang’s equaliser at Old Trafford in our 1-1 draw, he was miles onside but the linesman flagged it. Without it there we would have lost that game 1-0. Another decision it has made which was vital was in the North London Derby when Kane tried to buy a penalty late in the game, however VAR checked it and said no penalty.


Summary

Overall, there are many more negatives to the system than positives at the moment, however I feel it does have the potential to be very effective. Changes need to be made to improve how long it takes, who should view the incident, how many reviews you should get etc as this will give it a level of consistency between both teams, then fans will not be able to claim it’s biased. This will take time, prepare yourselves for the next couple of seasons it being inconsistent, but eventually it will reach a level where everyone is happy with it. To take football to the next level and to not be left behind, evolution is necessary and this is an excellent way to do this providing it has an adequate system in place, which it still has work to do in this regard. The FA needs to hold regular review meetings of how well the system is working and tweak it accordingly to make it the best it can be, if this is to happen I see no reason why it wouldn’t be hugely successful in the years to come.


Let me know your thoughts in the comments and vote in the poll below about whether it should be scrapped or not?

Feedback

Let me know your thoughts in the comments or join the discussion on Twitter & Instagram. Hit the share buttons at the bottom of the page!

James Humphreys
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started